Societas Via Romana - Discussion Archives

Salvete!

This is a dillemma that has been commented on since centuries: does objectivity exist? Is it possible to be objective?


Valete,

Locatus

Salve Locate,

Interesting question. I personally think objectivity does not exist but we can get close. Objectivity is a form of perfection or of perfect perception but since our perception is always limited (because we don't know enough information, because we don't have access to more information) I believe any kind of research, even in the "hard" sciences such as physics and math, will always be coloured because of the axioms they use (which, although they seem very logical, can't be proven).

I don't think subjectivity is a bad thing, by the way. In fact the study of literature is very subjective although students and scholars also form paradigms of logic and argumentation. As long as there are logical reasons or as long as there's sound thinking behind a subjective statement, why not?

Vale bene!
Draco

Salvete!

My view on this matter is simple: Objectivity is impossible. It doesn't matter how hard we try, we will always be looking upon certain facts from a personal standpoint (experience, our own values, etc.)

Is subjectivity a bad thing? The best way to say is: subjectivity is human. And it depends on yourself if you consider that a bad thing or a good thing...

What brings me to a next point: do values and virtues actually exist? What are they?


Valete,

Locatus

Salve,

Of course virtues and values exist. How else would you be able to speak of them?

Vale,
Draco

Well, actually I don't think they exist. And, to be honest, I hate it when someone uses the words 'virtues' and 'values' in a generalized matter.

I repeat my question: if they don't exist, how can you speak of them? They do exist. You have your own moral codes, I have mine. And they are virtues. They may be different virtues (although I doubt they differ much) but they are still virtues.

Vale bene,
Draco

I can speak of them because people believe they do exist. I don't think humans have very much moral codes. What I do believe is that societies of people shaped moral codes to make society more coherent.

And that's one of the reasons why I don't believe in virtues etc. Because they were not shaped by yourself, but by tradition. (And if there is one thing I hate it is tradition for the sake of tradition.) So when I hear this word, I already try to break it into little pieces.

It is true we need rules to be able to live together. And rules are only obbeyed when the people believe in them. Once there was a virtue of greed, adn there was an oil crisis. So there was a new law defining speed limits. Now, 30 years later, we do not obbey this law anymore because the virtue on which it was founded doesn't exist anymore.

Are there eternal virtues, values? I don't think so.

In this respect, virtues are indeed creations. But even traditions are created by men, and if you gain enough influence, you can not only create but also impose your own virtues.

However, aside from traditions, which go in and out of date, I do believe in some very basic, fundamental human virtues. Compassion, for instance. The ability to empathise with other people. Only psychopaths and other disordered people lack this ability. And people who don't feel much compassion or do not think highly of this are usually pretty shallow on an intellectual level, or disliked by other people.

An ideal virtue is something that benefits everyone: both the individual and the people around him.

Vale!
Draco