Review: "Ilium" by Dan Simmons

Roman arts, sciences, architecture and literature, and the modern creative efforts inspired by them. This is the home of our famous Roleplaying Thread. >({|:-)

Moderator: Aldus Marius

Review: "Ilium" by Dan Simmons

Postby Gnaeus Dionysius Draco on Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:16 pm

TITLE: "Ilium"
AUTHOR: Dan Simmons
YEAR: 2003
PUBLISHER: Gollancz (UK)
PLACE: London, United Kingdom

For those who are into science fiction, Dan Simmons is a well-established name in the genre. He became famous with his Hyperion tetralogy, a masterpiece in its own right that could be labelled as literary science fiction. The work contained many cross-references to John Keats, Shakespeare, English history, Greek myth, christianity, judaism, islam, zen-Buddhism and reflections about the possibilities of artificial intelligence and time travel. The good thing is that Simmons didn't trip over his own ambitions with his Hyperion-saga and delivered a story that is at once exciting, compelling and deeply reflexive.

Naturally, I was quite excited to see what "Ilium" was all about. A science fiction adaptation of the Trojan war!

"Ilium", which appears to be the start of another series in multiple parts, has three main storylines that come together neatly at the end. It is unclear in what time "Ilium" is set, but most parts of it seem to set against the background of a far future, when part of humanity has evolved into the so-called elusive 'post-humans' and a part of humanity has stayed back on earth, genetically and technologically advanced but very dumb and unquestioning about their own fate. Then there are the so-called moravecs, intelligent cyborgs that work and live on the Jovian moons and descend from man-made robots planted there long ago.

The story follows two of these moravecs, Mahnmut and Orphu, as they travel to Mars to research disturbing activities from the post-humans with quantum-leaping. The moravec storyline is by far the most interesting. The two discuss Shakespeare and Proust at great length and are both humorous and credible heroes. The only criticism I have about them, is their references to 20th and 21st-century culture, as if no noteworthy cultural events happened after that period. It's like two people today would constantly talk in an 18th-century frame of reference.

The second storyline deals with the actual Trojan wars. A man named Thomas Hockenberry, a Homer scholar, appears to have been zapped across time and space by 'the Gods' to observe as the Trojan war unfolds, along with other so-called scholics. It becomes appearent quickly that these 'Gods' are actually technologically superior humanoids that can do about anything with their technology. This is a pretty predictable twist, but it's not my greatest qualm with this storyline. Simmons imports parts of the Iliad, which are great to read within this context, but he brutally alternates these with "what the fuck" or "where the hell" phrases that totally not fit into the context.

It lasts until the end that Simmons can't decide whether to make fun out of the Greek heroes, or treat them seriously. It's just not very nuanced. Also, Hockenberry (who is another 20th century man) is not a very nuanced character. His thoughts on the war on terror or the sixties are uninteresting and don't make him a credible character. It appears that Simmons's editor took a leave of absence when they went through "Ilium". There are too many sentences, words and phrases that ought not to be there at all.

The third storyline, finally, is about humans on Earth, four of them, to be precise, that are being led by a mysterious woman named Savi, who gradually unfolds to them what is wrong with their world, why the humans are what they are now, and so on. This storyline makes for an enjoyable read, and it's interesting to see the evolution of the main character, Daeman, in this from an irritating, self-content snob to a true hero. On the way, they also run into Odysseus, Caliban and Prospero.

However, while the macro-story is once again an ingeniously woven plot that will no doubt only become better in the next installment, the micro-story shows a few holes that are unforgivable. For instance, the uncritical nature of the humans is very questionable, as is the sudden, abrupt demise of Savi at the hands of Caliban. Simmons also puzzles the reader when he lets Caliban speak Shakespearean English but makes Prospero speak standard modern English.

In concluding, if "Ilium" had gone through more phases of editing and critical in-house review, it would have been a new masterpiece. Simmons definitely knows his Iliad and demonstrates a sharp insight into literature and science. His contemporary cultural criticism should best be left alone, and he doesn't always control his own pen when it comes down to character portrayal or dialogue.

Final verdict: 75/100
Gn. Dionysius Draco Invictus
User avatar
Gnaeus Dionysius Draco
Curialis
Curialis
 
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:04 pm
Location: Belgica

Postby Tiberius Dionysius Draco on Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:23 pm

Salve Drace,

having read the book myself a few weeks ago (I borrowed it from you to be more precise :wink: ) I have to say I agree with you on most parts of your review.

There are, however, a few things I would like to add. First of all, he describes to little, the best descriptions that are given come from the Trojan Wars storyline but the sad thing is, they are almost a direct copy form the original Illiad.

Another point of criticism is the fact that it mentions a lot of Shakespearian characters (Caliban, Prospero and a few others) and the only way to know about these is to have read Shakespeare. Sadly, I have not, so I was often confused as to who thse people actually were. Many thanks to Draco for explaining some of them to me :D

Alright, so let me describe the storylines I liked and my thoughts about them:

Mahnmut and Orphu

Very confusing in the beginning, and rather boring for those that do not really care about the details of Shakespeares sonnets, however, this storyline grew on me en little by little, it became my favorite one.

Also, there is a lot of humour in it, which is definately a positive thing.

Trojan Wars

This is so-and-so, some parts are pretty good, the thing that I disliked the most about this storyline is that fact that apart from the heroes saying epic things he let's them talk slang. Bad decision on my opnion.

The evolution of this storyline is rather... bizarre. I hope more things will be explained in the next book, because right now, this is my least favorite storyline.

The Humans

It started out okay, but suddenly, it lost some of it's credility by having one of it's main characters eaten by a dinosaur. Very confusing to say the least.

Then, in the next chapter, this character is back with a minimal explantion. Eventually you'll understand what happened exactly to him but personally, I would've liked to have know sooner. I once again missed the lack of description in certain chapters of this storyline.

The Culmination

This is where all three storylines come together, Mahnmut and Orphu are still my favorites (talking about Shakespeare while in the middle of something akin to a nuclear explosion is very funny :) ).

The Trojan Heroes take off alongside with the scholar Hockenberry (I don't really like this character) and we'll find out what happens to them in the next book.

The Humans on the other hand, manage to break free from their ignorance and I'm very curious as to how this wil be continued in the next book.


Conclusion

I liked the book, though it had it's lesser parts and annoying bits, I would still rate it 70/100
Tiberius Dionysius Draco
User avatar
Tiberius Dionysius Draco
Curator
Curator
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 5:18 pm
Location: Belgica


Return to Collegium Artium et Litterarum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron