Review: "Troy"

Roman arts, sciences, architecture and literature, and the modern creative efforts inspired by them. This is the home of our famous Roleplaying Thread. >({|:-)

Moderator: Aldus Marius

Review: "Troy"

Postby Gnaeus Dionysius Draco on Sun May 30, 2004 3:42 pm

Movie: Troy (2004)
Directed by: Wolfgang Petersen

Just like "The Passion of the Christ", classici will have a field day with this movie. Make no mistake, "Troy" is still a movie about war, honour, shame, rivalry, cruelty and redemption but the most appearent difference with the classic, is the tone of the story. The "Iliad" and other epics of the Trojan cycle are much darker than this movie. In the epic, Agamemnon and Menelaos don't die, Andromache and Helena do not escape, king Priamos is killed in much more belittling way, Achilleus is not the moral hero and Astyanax (Hector's child) is thrown off the city walls by the Greek conquerors. This somewhat lighter tone is my most immediate qualm with the movie.

Purists will possibly also object to the absence of many other heroes such as Diomedes or Philoktetes, or the merging of the two Ajaxes and the merging of Chryseis and Briseis into Briseis, or the rivalry between Agamemnon and Achilleus starting out before the war. Or the fact that the siege of Troy lasts about three weeks in the movie but comprises ten years in the epic. Or the absence of the gods! Still, I don't consider these matters to be very important. This movie was not made to please purists, but to bring the story of Troy to a big audience. And it succeeds very well at that.

Brad Pitt (Achilleus) once again demonstrates his talent and depicts an excellent Achilleus, both in his whims, moods and pride. The suggested homo-flea-ridden tension between Achilleus and Patroklos is also played out nicely. Brian Cox (Agamemnon) obviously enjoys his role and is probably most faithful to the epic. Although Peter O'Toole (Priamos) has been almost universally praised for his performance, I did not find it completely satisfactory. He seemed to be using the same expression for both fear, amazement and sadness. Eric Bana (Hector) was a better fighter than an actor, but Wolfgang Petersen clearly made the best of the circumstances and the actors he was working with.

The choreography was good, but the spectacle factor could have been higher. After all, what Homer depicted was not the historical reality but an all-encompassing spectacular war. Petersen's Troy looks very spectacular, and so do the scenes of the armies crashing into each other, but the sense of doom and urgency of the battle is absent.

So, is it a good movie? Yes. Is it excellent? No.

VERDICT: 80/100

Gnaeus Dionysius Draco
Gn. Dionysius Draco Invictus
User avatar
Gnaeus Dionysius Draco
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:04 pm
Location: Belgica

Return to Collegium Artium et Litterarum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest